ICC rules against South Africa on shameful failure to arrest President Al-Bashir
In response to today’s finding by the International Criminal Court’s Pre-Trial Chamber that South Africa should have executed the arrest warrant against Sudanese president Omar Al-Bashir when he visited in June 2015, Amnesty International’s Africa Director for Research and Advocacy, Netsanet Belay said:
Today’s finding confirms what everyone, including South African authorities, knew all along. Al-Bashir does not have immunity from arrest
“Today’s finding confirms what everyone, including South African authorities, knew all along. Al-Bashir does not have immunity from arrest and all states parties to the Rome Statute must arrest him the minute he steps onto their territory and hand him over to the ICC.
“It is shocking that other states parties such as Jordan are also failing in their obligations to arrest Al-Bashir and this decision makes it clear that they do so in flagrant violation of international law.
South Africa breached its international and domestic legal obligations when it failed to arrest Al-Bashir
“South Africa breached its international and domestic legal obligations when it failed to arrest Al-Bashir. No state should follow this example. There must be no impunity for crimes under international law.
“By failing to execute the ICC’s warrant against Al-Bashir, South African authorities took away a major opportunity from victims to achieve justice. What's most important now is such shameful failure is never repeated. South Africa must now put its weight behind international justice which faces increasing global challenges.”
Today’s decision follows oral hearings and written submissions by the ICC’s Prosecutor and the Government of South Africa after the country was brought before the Pre-Trial Chamber for failing to arrest Sudanese president Omar Al-Bashir in 2015. On 15 March 2016 South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that the government’s failure to arrest him was unlawful.
Following the conclusion of South Africa’s domestic legal processes, the Pre-Trial Chamber convened a hearing in April 2017.