Further information on UA: 249/10 Index: MDE 23/003/2011 Saudi Arabia Date: 23 February 2011
PROFESSOR RELEASED, NO FURTHER ACTION NEEDED
Law professor Dr Mohammed ‘Abdullah al-‘Abdulkareem was released on 15 February. He was
arrested in relation to an article he wrote about the Saudi Arabian royal family and the future of
Saudi Arabia which was posted on his Facebook page.
Dr Mohammed al-‘Abdulkareem, a 40-year-old law professor who is married with three children, was released on 15
February following over two months’ detention in al-Ha’ir prison in Riyadh. He was arrested on 5 December 2010 in
the afternoon, at his home, by four men in civilian clothes believed to be members of the Interior Ministry’s General
Intelligence (al-Mabahith al-‘Amma), as well as several police officers in uniform. A few minutes after his arrest he
called his wife and told her that he was being taken to the General Intelligence prison but would return that night.
He was arrested in relation to an article he wrote and posted on his Facebook page on 23 November 2010. He was
interrogated about the article during his time in detention. He was released but was told that his case file was being
kept open and as such could be brought to trial at any time.
The article, written in Arabic, is entitled “The crisis of political conflict among the ruling factions in Saudi Arabia”.
It asks the question “Is the continuation of the Kingdom as united in one entity conditional on the existence of the
[ruling] family?” and answers it by reviewing the uncertainty around succession in the royal family and other
institutional processes affecting the future of Saudi Arabia. The article does not make reference to or advocate
violence in any way.
Dr Mohammed al-‘Abdulkareem is a professor in the Faculty of Islamic Jurisprudence in the Imam Muhammad bin
Saud Islamic University in Riyadh and editor-in-chief of a journal on Islamic issues entitled Congress of the Nation.
On 29 November, the administration of his university summoned him to a meeting and asked him if he had written
the article; he refused to reply.
No further action is requested from the UA network. Many thanks to all who sent appeals.
This is the first update of UA 249/10. Further information: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/mde23/015/2010