Human Rights Council elections 2008 - United Kingdom
Amnesty International is concerned that UK legislation and policy aimed at countering terrorism are undermining the framework of human rights protection both in the UK and internationally.
The UK continues to attempt to deport people whom they assert pose a threat to the UK’s national security to states where they face a real risk of grave human rights violations, including torture or other ill-treatment, in reliance on so-called "diplomatic assurances". The UK asserts that these unenforceable assurances are sufficient to reduce the risk that these individuals will be subject to grave human rights violations.
Appeals against orders for deportation on national security grounds fail to protect the right to a fair hearing, because such appeals are heavily reliant on closed sessions of the court, where secret material is considered in the absence of the individuals concerned and their lawyers of choice.
Also of concern is the system of "control orders", which allow a government minister to impose, subject to limited judicial scrutiny, often severe restrictions on the liberty of individuals who are suspected of involvement in terrorism-related activity, but have not been charged with any criminal offence. These individuals also face the prospect of having secret information used against them in closed court sessions.
Amnesty International is concerned by the UK authorities' approach to limiting the applicability of obligations under international human rights treaties and domestic human rights law to the conduct of the UK’s armed forces overseas.
The Inquiries Act 2005 undermines the possibility of independent public scrutiny of, and accountability for, violations committed by agents of the UK. The executive retains significant powers over any inquiry conducted under the Act.
Accountability is further frustrated by inadequate oversight of the security and intelligence services. The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), which is supposed to oversee the work of these agencies, is appointed by and reports directly to the Prime Minister. Its reports are published subject to his control.
The ISC is not able to conduct the independent investigations needed into the alleged involvement of the intelligence agencies in human rights violations, such as allegations of UK involvement in the US-led programme of secret detentions and renditions.
Amnesty International is also concerned about immigration and asylum laws. NGOs estimate that more than 280,000 refused asylum seekers are destitute in the UK; they are not permitted to work and they no longer receive asylum support. Women who are subject to immigration control and who have experienced violence in the UK, including domestic violence and trafficking, find it almost impossible to access housing benefit or income support, as a result of the "no recourse to public funds" rule.
This rule provides that certain categories of immigrants have no right to access income-related benefits or housing and homelessness support. Consequently, these women do not have access to refuges, and are unable to flee from the violence they face.
UK: The death of Jean Charles de Menezes: full and public scrutiny still needed (Public Statement, 1 November 2007)
UK: Time to abandon the policy of ‘deportation with assurances’ (Public Statement, 9 April 2008)
Sources:
The UK continues to attempt to deport people whom they assert pose a threat to the UK’s national security to states where they face a real risk of grave human rights violations, including torture or other ill-treatment, in reliance on so-called "diplomatic assurances". The UK asserts that these unenforceable assurances are sufficient to reduce the risk that these individuals will be subject to grave human rights violations.
Appeals against orders for deportation on national security grounds fail to protect the right to a fair hearing, because such appeals are heavily reliant on closed sessions of the court, where secret material is considered in the absence of the individuals concerned and their lawyers of choice.
Also of concern is the system of "control orders", which allow a government minister to impose, subject to limited judicial scrutiny, often severe restrictions on the liberty of individuals who are suspected of involvement in terrorism-related activity, but have not been charged with any criminal offence. These individuals also face the prospect of having secret information used against them in closed court sessions.
Amnesty International is concerned by the UK authorities' approach to limiting the applicability of obligations under international human rights treaties and domestic human rights law to the conduct of the UK’s armed forces overseas.
The Inquiries Act 2005 undermines the possibility of independent public scrutiny of, and accountability for, violations committed by agents of the UK. The executive retains significant powers over any inquiry conducted under the Act.
Accountability is further frustrated by inadequate oversight of the security and intelligence services. The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), which is supposed to oversee the work of these agencies, is appointed by and reports directly to the Prime Minister. Its reports are published subject to his control.
The ISC is not able to conduct the independent investigations needed into the alleged involvement of the intelligence agencies in human rights violations, such as allegations of UK involvement in the US-led programme of secret detentions and renditions.
Amnesty International is also concerned about immigration and asylum laws. NGOs estimate that more than 280,000 refused asylum seekers are destitute in the UK; they are not permitted to work and they no longer receive asylum support. Women who are subject to immigration control and who have experienced violence in the UK, including domestic violence and trafficking, find it almost impossible to access housing benefit or income support, as a result of the "no recourse to public funds" rule.
This rule provides that certain categories of immigrants have no right to access income-related benefits or housing and homelessness support. Consequently, these women do not have access to refuges, and are unable to flee from the violence they face.
Recent Amnesty International statements and reports:
General
Amnesty International Annual Report extracts for United Kingdom, 2005-2007Counter-terrorism and human rights
UK: Human rights: a broken promise (Report, 23 February 2006)UK: The death of Jean Charles de Menezes: full and public scrutiny still needed (Public Statement, 1 November 2007)
UK: Time to abandon the policy of ‘deportation with assurances’ (Public Statement, 9 April 2008)
Extraordinary renditions
Partners in crime: Europe’s role in US renditions (Report, 14 June 2006)Armed conflict and acts of armed forces
UK: Amnesty International’s reaction to Law Lords’ judgment in the Al-Skeini & Others case (Public Statement, 13 June 2007)Asylum
Down and out in London: The road to destitution for rejected asylum seekers (PDF, 229 KB, 36 Pages – Amnesty International UK Section, November 2006)Ratification of International Treaties
| Treaty | Status | Recognition of specific competences of Treaty Bodies | Reservations/Declarations |
| International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) | Ratified | Art. 41 (inter-state complaints) | Entered |
| Optional Protocol to the ICCPR | |||
| Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR on the death penalty | Ratified | ||
| International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights | Ratified | Entered | |
| Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) | Ratified | Entered | |
| Optional Protocol to CEDAW | Acceded | Arts. 8 and 9 (inquiry procedure) | |
| International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination | Ratified | None | Entered |
| Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) | Ratified | Art. 20 (inquiry procedure) Art. 21 (inter-state complaints) | Entered |
| Optional Protocol to CAT | Ratified | ||
| Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) | Ratified | Entered | |
| Optional Protocol to the CRC on children in armed conflict | Ratified | Entered | |
| Optional Protocol to the CRC on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography | Signed | ||
| International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families | |||
| International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance | |||
| Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court | Ratified | Entered | |
| Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees | Ratified | Entered | |
| Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees | Acceded | Entered | |
| The Four Geneva Conventions | Ratified | ||
| Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts | Ratified | Entered | |
| Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts | Ratified | ||
| Protocol III to the Geneva Conventions relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem | Signed |
Compliance with Reporting Obligations
| Total Overdue Reports | Up to 5 years overdue | 5 -10 years overdue | 10 years or more overdue |
| 2 | CERD: 18th and 19th periodic reports |
Cooperation with the Special Procedures
| Extension of a standing invitation | Outstanding visit requests (year requested) | Forthcoming visits (dates if available) | Missions carried out between May 2007 and April 2008 |
| All Special Procedures | None | Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries | Special Rapporteur on Freedom of religion or Belief (June 2007) |
- Compilation Prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, in accordance with paragraph 15(B) of Resolution 5/1 of the Human Rights Council – 27 March 2008 (A/HRC/WG.6/1/GBR/2)
- Official Website of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights – http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/ratification/index.htm
http://www.unhchr.ch/
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/chr/special/countryvisitsf-m.htm - Official Website of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees – http://www.unhcr.org/protect/3c0762ea4.html
- Official Website of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court – http://untreaty.un.org/ENGLISH/bible/englishinternetbible/partI/chapterXVIII/treaty11.asp
- Official Website of the International Committee of the Red Cross – http://www.cicr.org/ihl.nsf/Pays?ReadForm
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Technorati