Document - United Arab Emirates: Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review: Third session of the UPR Working Group of the UN Human Rights Council, December 2008

14 July 2008 Public

amnesty international

United Arab Emirates

Submission to the

UN Universal Periodic Review

Third session of the UPR Working Group of the

UN Human Rights Council

December 2008

United Arab Emirates

Amnesty International submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review

Third session of the UPR Working Group, December 2008


In this submission, Amnesty International provides information under sections B, C and D as stipulated in the General Guidelines for the Preparation of Information under the Universal Periodic Review:1 Under section B, Amnesty International raises concern over the death penalty and provisions cruel, inhuman or degrading punishments and the rights of migrant workers. Section C highlights Amnesty International’s concerns incommunicado detention and torture; women’s human rights, cooperation with the UN’s human rights mechanisms; restrictions on the right to freedom of expression, and human rights defenders. In section D, Amnesty International makes a number of recommendations for action by the government.

B. Normative and institutional framework of the State

The death penalty

The United Arab Emirates retains the death penalty in national legislation and in 1995 introduced the death penalty for drug trafficking; however, no executions for this offence are known to have been carried out.

In 2007, at least two people were sentenced to death and in 2006, in the Emirate of Fujairah, a court imposed a sentence of death by stoning on a Bangladeshi national after convicting him of adultery with an unnamed female migrant domestic worker whose origin was not known. She was sentenced to 100 lashes and one year’s imprisonment. The death sentence was subsequently commuted to a one-year prison sentence followed by deportation.

In December 2007, the United Arab Emirates abstained in the vote in the General Assembly on resolution 62/149 calling for a moratorium on executions and, on 2 February 2008, it was one of the 58 states that signed a statement of disassociation with the resolution, placing on record their “persistent objection to any attempt to impose a moratorium on the use of the death penalty or its abolition in contravention to existing stipulations under international law”.2

Amnesty International unconditionally opposes the death penalty in all circumstances as a violation of the right to life and the ultimate cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment.

Cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment

In all of the Emirates, except Dubai, flogging sentences are imposed on those caught having “illicit sex” and Amnesty International has recorded such sentences against, in particular, migrant workers.3

Migrant workers

A draft labour law, issued in February 2007 to streamline employment practices, provides for the punishment of striking workers, but not for the right to organize, bargain collectively or strike. The draft excludes migrant workers, farmers, public sector workers and private security staff.

In August and October 2007, hundreds of construction workers, all of them migrant workers, went on strike in Dubai to protest against low salaries and poor housing conditions, including a lack of safe water supplies.

Domestic migrant workers continue to be denied the protection of labour legislation. Hence, they do not formally have the right to a weekly day of rest, limits on hours of work, paid holidays or forms of compensation.

Allegations of abuse include ill-treatment, including sexual abuse, and non-payment of wages.

In November 2006, the President issued a federal law against human trafficking, which prescribes penalties ranging from one year to life imprisonment.

C. Promotion and protection of human rights on the ground

Incommunicado detention and torture

Amnesty International has regularly raised with the authorities reports of persons – both Emirati and foreign - arbitrarily arrested and held incommunicado for prolonged periods of time, commonly in undisclosed locations where they may face torture and other ill treatment. Those responsible are usually said to be members of Amn al-Dawla (State Security).

Following the attacks on the United States on 11 September 2001, hundreds of Emirati nationals were detained, including military personnel and judges. Scores were detained for several years and some faced torture and other ill treatment, including by the forced administration – by way of injection – of substances that induce drowsiness and lethargy.

Other forms torture and other ill treatment documented by Amnesty International have included sleep deprivation, suspension by the wrists or ankles, severe beatings to the soles of the feet, the use of electric shocks to various parts of the body, and threats of sexual violence. In one case, the person concerned alleged during the subsequent trial that he had been tortured while detained by Amn al-Dawla (State Security) officers in the Emirate of ‘Ajman. The court did not order an investigation into these allegations.4

In an encouraging development in June 2008, the former director of a Dubai jail and 24 wardens and police officers were sentenced to prison terms for beating up inmates during a check for drugs on 1 August 2007. They were all accused of “abuse of power and ill-treatment of detainees under their guard”. The former director and six wardens and officers were sentenced to six months in prison while the rest received three-month sentences.

Women’s human rights

Women in the United Arab Emirates continue to suffer the impact of discriminatory laws and practices which affect most aspects of their life, including marriage and the choice of marriage partner, dissolution of marriage and child custody, and inheritance. Under the nationality law, a woman is unable to pass on her nationality to her children if she is married to a foreign national. As a result, the children suffer severe restrictions including on their residency and employment rights. They are treated as foreigners in higher education and pay higher fees, and as migrant workers in employment.

Cooperation with UN human rights mechanisms

In the course of 2007, the government failed to respond to UN human rights bodies in respect to requests for access and on individual cases raised in 2006. Citing concerns about trafficking for the purposes of forced labour, in May the Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons reiterated a previously unmet request to visit the United Arab Emirates. In March, the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants expressed “his interest in receiving a reply” on cases of abuses against migrant workers in previous years. The Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions reported in March that the government had not responded to concerns from 2006 on death penalty safeguards.

Other UN Special Rapporteurs, including on human rights defenders, violence against women, the independence of judges and lawyers, and freedom of expression, all reported that the government had failed to reply to concerns raised by their offices.

Restrictions on the right to freedom of expression

There are also reports of restrictions on the right to freedom of expression. In August 2007, the owner of a website received a five-month prison sentence on counts of defamation. The court also ordered the website to be closed. In September, two journalists working for the Khaleej Times were sentenced to two- month prison terms for defamation. However, on that occasion Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al-Maktoum, Vice-President, Prime Minister and Ruler of Dubai, decreed that no journalist should receive a prison sentence for press-related offences. He also urged for the enactment of a new press and publications law.

In November 2007, in an administrative measure widely seen as punitive, the authorities moved more than 80 teachers to other state jobs apparently because they were suspected of holding Islamist views.

Political parties do not exist in the United Arab Emirates; political dissent is not tolerated and those targeted for arrest include Islamists or those critical of the human rights situation in the country.

Harassment of human rights defenders

In recent years prominent human rights activists have faced harassment, including the former President of the Jurists’ Association who was detained twice by Amn al-Dawla (State Security) officials. Upon release, his passport was confiscated.

  1. Recommendations for action by the State under review

Amnesty International calls on the government to:

Ratification of human rights instruments

  • Ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;

  • Ratify the Migrant Workers Convention and ensure that its provisions are implemented;

  • Ratify the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment;

The death penalty

  • Establish a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty as provided by UN General Assembly resolution 62/149, adopted on 18 December 2007.

Incommunicado detention and torture

  • Publish up-to-date lists of all places of detention in a form that is readily accessible to lawyers and members of the public as a step towards ending the practice of incommunicado and secret detention and torture and other ill treatment; and make clear to all officers involved in arrest, detention and interrogation, in particular those of the Amn al-Dawla, that torture and other ill-treatment will not be tolerated under any circumstances and that those found responsible will be brought to justice in accordance with international standards for fair trial;

  • Ensure that detainees have immediate access – by law and in practice – to the outside world, in particular their lawyers and families, as well as adequate medical care;

  • Establish and maintain a central register to ensure that all detainees can be promptly traced; and bring appropriate sanctions against officers responsible for the unlawful detention of detainees, including failure to keep proper records of detainees;

  • Allow regular, unannounced, independent and unrestricted inspections by national and international independent expert bodies to all places where people are or may be deprived of their liberty;

  • End torture including by bring to light the practice of torture and ill-treatment, both pre or post-trial, and to ensure that detainees who lodge complaints about torture or ill-treatment can do so without fear of any kind of reprisal or prosecution.

Restrictions on the rights to freedom of expression, assembly and association

  • Uphold the rights to freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and freedom of association and to allow restrictions only when prescribed by law, in accordance with international human rights law;

  • Address deficiencies in the NGO law and its implementing regulations so that the law enables the exercise of the right to freedom of association;

  • Amend the overly broad provisions in the law to combat extremist activities which criminalise the peaceful exercise of freedom of expression and association;

Human rights defenders

  • Cease all intimidation of human rights defenders and adhere to the principles of UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders as a part of domestic legislation and reform legal provisions to fully protect the rights of human rights defenders, including by repealing laws that place unnecessary restrictions on human rights defenders exercising their rights to peaceful assembly and freedom of association;

  • Refrain from using “extremism”-related and other laws to clamp down on peaceful dissent, independent media and civil society organizations;

  • Investigate fully, promptly and impartially any reported human rights abuses against civil society activists, journalists and members of groups or communities, and to bring to justice anyone suspected of involvement in such abuses, in trials which meet international standards of fair trial.

Cooperation with UN human rights mechanisms

  • Cooperate fully with, and to accept all outstanding requests by UN Special Rapporteurs to visit the United Arab Emirates.

Appendix: Amnesty International documents for further reference5

Stop Violence Against women Report - Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC): Women deserve dignity and respect (AI Index MDE 04/004/2005)

United Arab Emirates: Amnesty International seeks clarification of the fate of 26 men arrested at a “gay wedding ceremony”, Index: MDE 25/008/2005, 5 December 2005.

The Gulf and the Arabian Peninsula: Human rights fall victim to the “War on Terror” (AI Index: MDE 04/002/2004)

1 Contained in Human Rights Council Decision 6/102, Follow-up to Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, section I adopted 27 September 2007.

2 For more information, see Amnesty International: Death Penalty News - January- March 2008 (AI Index: ACT 53/002/2008)

3 In 2007, a court in al-‘Ain convicted a teenage girl to 60 lashes for having “illicit sex” with a man when she was 14. The sentence was upheld on appeal; it is not known, however, if the sentence was carried out. In October 2005, a female domestic migrant worker was sentenced to 150 lashes for becoming pregnant outside marriage, by a court in the Emirate of Ras al-Khaimah. In December 2005, two female domestic migrant workers – an Indonesian and an Indian national – were sentenced to flogging of 150 and 100 lashes, respectively, after becoming pregnant outside marriage by a court in Ras al-Khaimah. In both cases the punishments were to be followed by deportation.

4 Cases documented by Amnesty International include that of Pakistan national, Rashed Mahmood. He was detained in ‘Ajman in June 2007 and held incommunicado for more than three months. He was released without charge in September and expelled to Pakistan. He was reported to have been severely beaten during the first two weeks of detention. A Sudanese national who was arrested and detained for two days without explanation after he arrived in the UAE in September 2007 subsequently went missing, raising fears that he was the victim of an enforced disappearance. Al-Sadiq Sediq Adam Abdalla is still missing in July 2008. In 2005 several political suspects were detained and held incommunicado in undisclosed locations, in some cases for long periods. The exact reasons for arrest were never known but those detained were possibly suspected of being “Islamists” or having “Islamist views”. They were held in solitary confinement, allowed to make brief phone calls, around once a month, to their families and when they were released they were told not to talk about their time in detention. A 34-year-old employee of the telecommunications company Etisalat, Hassan al-Za’abi, was arrested and “disappeared” after his car was stopped by members of Amn al-Dawla on 1 August 2004 in Abu Dhabi. Despite several appeals by his family his fate and whereabouts remained unknown. The reasons for his arrest were not clear but were thought to be politically motivated.

5 All of these documents are available on Amnesty International’s website:

AI Index: MDE 25/006/2008 Amnesty International

How you can help